Crypto traders and investors are overwhelmed by the number of ICO's and amount of information that they have at their disposal. How much of that information is really relevant? On top of that, finding the right ICO to invest in requires a lot of time, experience and knowledge to know if the project is really going to be a success. If that is not enough, just imagine a corrupted system that gives ratings based on the monetary compensation from the ICO’s themselves, or if you like, paid ratings. Not just that, experts who are supposed to do the evaluation are not even verified, certified or tested as cryptocurrency and blockchain experts. Literally anyone can become an expert as there is no verification process implemented anywhere. So why waste your precious time on the projects that do not have potential and are boosted with fake ratings? Why not have someone to do the evaluation for you? Wouldn't it be better and easier to have a report about an ICO that is already investigated and evaluated by an expert which will have all the critical information that will help with the investment decision?
Вся представленная на сайте информация, касающаяся описания ICO проектов, стоимость, и возможности инвестиций, носит исключительно информационный характер и ни при каких условиях не является публичной офертой
Инвестируя в это ICO вы соглашаетесь с Пользовательским соглашением